Skip to main content

View Post [edit]

Poster: Diana Hamilton Date: Dec 2, 2005 10:28pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Whose legal opinions?

Or, *don't* cite case law here. There are probably other legal cracker barrel forums to which you guys can go and hash stuff out. Some kind of Moot Court website out there? But here, as we can see from
the chosen resolution is understanding, gentlemanly compromise, patience, and respect. Not legal briefs.

In the old "about forum posting" thread, I said that people should confine their discussion of bands as it relates to the Archive. If people want to talk about "best grilled cheese in the parking lot", even though it might have been a Dead show parking lot, it is better to go to another forum somewhere else to do that. At this time, "best legal strategy" is another topic that has drifted a bit too far for here.

Reply [edit]

Poster: Liamfinnegan Date: Dec 3, 2005 2:03am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Whose legal opinions?


I am perfectly comfortable with the current resolution, as Ihave stated previously. And I had refrained from legal issues for only as long as I could, until some posters started to say things that were just not true. That is what bothers me- I cannot let those kind of statements go by without comment.

So long as others want to refrain from discussin copyright law, I will be glad to sit here and "Just listen to the music play.."

Reply [edit]

Poster: Diana Hamilton Date: Dec 4, 2005 10:36pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Whose legal opinions?

OK Liam, so if you could just help me nag folks into not wasting their legal breath here (trained or untrained), that would be great, thanks! Update:
This post was modified by Diana Hamilton on 2005-12-05 06:36:26